Define the review purpose
Before analysis, write down what the reader needs: completed work, remaining work and the next decision. This gives you a concrete basis for assessing vague passages.
Paste the update into the AI text detector and run the review. The text is sent to the configured model after you press the action button.
- Keep the original update.
- List the reader needs.
- Analyze the draft.
Ask for evidence constructively
A comment about generic phrasing should lead to a factual question. Ask the writer which tasks were completed, rather than assuming how the text was produced.
Retain source notes or working records when available. A language pattern alone cannot establish whether a claim is accurate or who authored it.
- Locate a vague statement.
- Ask for supporting details.
- Check the relevant record.
Edit and verify
Rewrite the update with confirmed information only. Do not turn a proposed action into a commitment or add a successful outcome that has not occurred.
The style editor and grammar checker can help with the final wording. Read the finished message against the original notes before publishing.
- Replace one vague claim.
- Check dates and commitments.
- Review the complete update.
Worked example
The project is progressing successfully and many important activities have been completed.
If the notes confirm it: The draft outline is complete. The examples still need review before Friday.
The revised sentence is appropriate only when its details are supported by the project notes.
Before you finish
- Reader needs are explicit.
- Added details have a source.
- Plans remain plans.
- Language signals are not authorship proof.
Questions and answers
Can the detector verify project progress?
No. Progress must be checked against the actual project records.
Should I ask the author to explain the draft?
You can ask about sources and intended meaning constructively. Do not frame stylistic observations as a proven authorship verdict.