Start with observations
Repeated sentence openings, vague claims and very regular sentence lengths can make a draft feel mechanical. They also occur in human writing, templates and translated material.
The AI text detector describes such patterns. It does not provide a reliable authorship verdict, an accuracy percentage or an AI probability score.
- Paste the passage.
- Run the analysis.
- Separate observations from assumptions.
Check the actual passage
Locate each pattern mentioned in the result. A useful comment should point to wording you can inspect, rather than a broad claim about the author.
Compare the language with the genre. A brief operational notice may appropriately repeat a structure that would feel tiring in a personal essay.
- Find the cited wording.
- Consider the document type.
- Keep explanations that fit the source.
Turn the review into edits
If a paragraph is vague, ask what happened, when it happened and which evidence supports it. Add only details you can verify with the author or source.
Use the style editor for clearer phrasing, then compare the revision with the original. Improving a draft does not establish its origin.
- Identify a reader problem.
- Make one focused edit.
- Check that facts stayed intact.
Worked example
Our solution delivers excellent results. Our solution improves every workflow. Our solution supports successful outcomes.
An editorial observation: the opening repeats and the outcomes are unspecified. Ask for concrete, supported details.
This is an illustrative interpretation of visible wording, not a finding that the paragraph was generated by AI.
Before you finish
- No authorship accusation from style.
- No invented probability or score.
- Comments refer to visible wording.
- Edits use verified facts.
Questions and answers
Does repetition prove AI authorship?
No. Human writing, standard templates and translation can also produce repetition.
What should I do with a suspicious result?
Review the wording and its sources. Treat the result as uncertain rather than evidence of misconduct.